Архив форума "Клуб любителей DVD" с 2000 по 2014гг

продолжение (+)

Автор: Филипп3
Дата: 30.10.13, @16:19

ссылки на публикации

аспартам и рак
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20886530

аспартам и набор веса
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666312004138

This hypothesis was also demonstrated in a 2012 study published in the journal Appetite,11 which showed that saccharin and aspartame both cause greater weight gain than sugar. Rats were fed plain yogurt sweetened with either aspartame, saccharin, or sugar, plus their regular rat chow, for 12 weeks.

“Results showed that addition of either saccharin or aspartame to yogurt resulted in increased weight gain compared to addition of sucrose, however total caloric intake was similar among groups,” the researchers write.12

The reason for the similar calorie consumption between the groups was due to increased chow consumption by the rats given artificially sweetened yoghurt. This type of compensation has been found in previous studies13 as well, indicating that when your body gets a hit of sweet taste without the calories to go with it, it adversely affects your appetite control mechanisms, causing increased food cravings. That’s all good and well, and mounting research appears to support this “metabolic derangement” hypothesis.

However, Dr. Gupta falls short when it comes to the overall health hazards of artificial sweeteners—completely dismissing the inherent toxicity of artificial sweeteners like aspartame. He even claims that there’s “no evidence of a link” between aspartame and cancer, stating that aspartame has been on the market since the 60’s and no such link has been shown in the 40 years since. I guess it’s really a matter of looking at the available evidence.

Not only have studies showing a cancer link been published in recent years, but during our 40-year long “war on cancer,” cancer rates have in fact increased despite scientific advances in treatment, and now surpass heart disease as the number one killer of Americans under the age of 85.14 The reason for this is still under debate, as no particular industry wants to take responsibility for their contribution to toxic overload in the population at large...In my view however, I believe it is irresponsibly negligent to flatly ignore the potential impact of artificial sweeteners on our skyrocketing disease rates. Telling people to consume a toxic agent “in moderation” is just not good advice in my opinion.

As for the potential cancer link, one lifetime feeding study published in 201015 found that aspartame induced cancers of the liver and lung in male mice. It was also carcinogenic in male and female rats. Another study of great importance was published just last year. It’s the most comprehensive and longest human study— spanning 22 years — that has ever looked at aspartame toxicity. The study evaluated the effect between aspartame intake and cancer, and they found a clear association between aspartame consumption and non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and leukemia.

Recent research has also demonstrated that aspartame worsens insulin sensitivity to a greater degree than sugar, which is quite the blow for diabetics who obediently follow the recommendation to switch to diet sodas to manage their condition. The researchers used a dosage of aspartame that approximates the ADI for aspartame in the US (approx. 50 mg/kg body weight), and not only was aspartame found to decrease insulin sensitivity compared to controls, it also wrought havoc on brain function.

Сообщения в ветке

арчер, вопрос к тебе (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@12:22 (Чит.: 174)

RE: арчер, вопрос к тебе (+) -- Арчер -- 30.10.13@15:14 (Чит.: 189)

RE: арчер, вопрос к тебе (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@15:17 (Чит.: 183)

RE: арчер, вопрос к тебе (+) -- Арчер -- 30.10.13@15:21 (Чит.: 178)

RE: арчер, вопрос к тебе (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@16:05 (Чит.: 142)

RE: арчер, вопрос к тебе (+) -- Арчер -- 30.10.13@16:10 (Чит.: 130)

RE: арчер, вопрос к тебе (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@16:14 (Чит.: 136)

А у меня на него (аспартам этот) аллергия (+) -- MAX -- 30.10.13@15:32 (Чит.: 152)

RE: А у меня на него (аспартам этот) аллергия (+) -- Арчер -- 30.10.13@16:03 (Чит.: 140)

Кстати, да, из пепси тоже больше всего макс нравится [-] -- Raindog -- 30.10.13@16:12 (Чит.: 113)
А я вообще газировку пью (+) -- MAX -- 30.10.13@16:11 (Чит.: 138)

RE: А у меня на него (аспартам этот) аллергия (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@15:37 (Чит.: 142)

То есть, ты хочешь сказать, что этот привкус у всех??? (+) -- MAX -- 30.10.13@15:42 (Чит.: 136)

привкус у лайта и зеро -- musha -- 30.10.13@19:18 (Чит.: 121)
RE: То есть, ты хочешь сказать, что этот привкус у всех??? (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@15:45 (Чит.: 158)

Вот я, например, такой урод - люблю кока-колу лайт(+) -- Raindog -- 30.10.13@16:07 (Чит.: 130)

RE: Вот я, например, такой урод - люблю кока-колу лайт(+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@16:13 (Чит.: 136)

я понимаю что чужая мова трудна для понимания -- musha -- 30.10.13@19:17 (Чит.: 130)
продолжение (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@16:19 (Чит.: 139)
Про этот эффект знаю. Ко мне не относится. :) [-] -- Raindog -- 30.10.13@16:17 (Чит.: 112)

а про рак знаешь? :) выше (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@16:19 (Чит.: 137)

Сейчас некогда изучать, попозже гляну [-] -- Raindog -- 30.10.13@16:27 (Чит.: 114)
RE: Филипп рака не боится, у него шапочка из фольги! (+) -- Арчер -- 30.10.13@16:22 (Чит.: 129)

я тебе ссылку на исследования дал (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@16:23 (Чит.: 137)

RE: я тебе ссылку на исследования дал (+) -- Арчер -- 30.10.13@17:12 (Чит.: 125)

RE: я тебе ссылку на исследования дал (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@17:52 (Чит.: 124)

опять же чужая мова очень трудна для понимания -- musha -- 30.10.13@19:21 (Чит.: 121)

RE: Ты от Филиппа многого требуешь, нельзя быть экспертом во всем) -- Арчер -- 30.10.13@20:25 (Чит.: 126)

RE: Ты от Филиппа многого требуешь, нельзя быть экспертом во всем) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@21:49 (Чит.: 126)

RE: Ты от Филиппа многого требуешь, нельзя быть экспертом во всем) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@21:50 (Чит.: 127)

Почему нельзя? Даже на этой доске куча обратных примеров! (-) -- MAX -- 30.10.13@21:05 (Чит.: 104)

RE: я тебе ссылку на исследования дал (+) -- Арчер -- 30.10.13@18:15 (Чит.: 127)

арчеру показывать бессмысленно :) он фанатик (-) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@16:21 (Чит.: 106)

RE: То есть, ты хочешь сказать, что этот привкус у всех??? (+) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@15:48 (Чит.: 131)

это всё наши тараканы! то-же терпеть не могу данную гадость :))))) (-) -- fighter125 -- 30.10.13@15:53 (Чит.: 121)

А как еще можно оценивать пищу, как не на вкус??? (-) -- MAX -- 30.10.13@15:55 (Чит.: 119)

арчер говорит, что только по "независимым экспертизам". и если твоё мнение не совпадает с "правильным", то это твои тараканы (-)їdmitry -- fighter125 -- 31.10.13@15:59 (Чит.: 125)

арчер, ответь плиз :) (-) -- Филипп3 -- 30.10.13@15:09 (Чит.: 113)

' ссылки на публикации
' 
' аспартам и рак
' <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20886530">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20886530</a>
' 
' аспартам и набор веса
' <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666312004138">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666312004138</a>
' 
' This hypothesis was also demonstrated in a 2012 study published in the journal Appetite,11 which showed that saccharin and aspartame both cause greater weight gain than sugar. Rats were fed plain yogurt sweetened with either aspartame, saccharin, or sugar, plus their regular rat chow, for 12 weeks.
' 
' “Results showed that addition of either saccharin or aspartame to yogurt resulted in increased weight gain compared to addition of sucrose, however total caloric intake was similar among groups,” the researchers write.12
' 
' The reason for the similar calorie consumption between the groups was due to increased chow consumption by the rats given artificially sweetened yoghurt. This type of compensation has been found in previous studies13 as well, indicating that when your body gets a hit of sweet taste without the calories to go with it, it adversely affects your appetite control mechanisms, causing increased food cravings. That’s all good and well, and mounting research appears to support this “metabolic derangement” hypothesis.
' 
' However, Dr. Gupta falls short when it comes to the overall health hazards of artificial sweeteners—completely dismissing the inherent toxicity of artificial sweeteners like aspartame. He even claims that there’s “no evidence of a link” between aspartame and cancer, stating that aspartame has been on the market since the 60’s and no such link has been shown in the 40 years since. I guess it’s really a matter of looking at the available evidence.
' 
' Not only have studies showing a cancer link been published in recent years, but during our 40-year long “war on cancer,” cancer rates have in fact increased despite scientific advances in treatment, and now surpass heart disease as the number one killer of Americans under the age of 85.14 The reason for this is still under debate, as no particular industry wants to take responsibility for their contribution to toxic overload in the population at large...In my view however, I believe it is irresponsibly negligent to flatly ignore the potential impact of artificial sweeteners on our skyrocketing disease rates. Telling people to consume a toxic agent “in moderation” is just not good advice in my opinion.
' 
' As for the potential cancer link, one lifetime feeding study published in 201015 found that aspartame induced cancers of the liver and lung in male mice. It was also carcinogenic in male and female rats. Another study of great importance was published just last year. It’s the most comprehensive and longest human study— spanning 22 years — that has ever looked at aspartame toxicity. The study evaluated the effect between aspartame intake and cancer, and they found a clear association between aspartame consumption and non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and leukemia.
' 
' Recent research has also demonstrated that aspartame worsens insulin sensitivity to a greater degree than sugar, which is quite the blow for diabetics who obediently follow the recommendation to switch to diet sodas to manage their condition. The researchers used a dosage of aspartame that approximates the ADI for aspartame in the US (approx. 50 mg/kg body weight), and not only was aspartame found to decrease insulin sensitivity compared to controls, it also wrought havoc on brain function.

Посылать уведомление об ответе:

[Индекс] [Посмотреть ветку] [Настройки] [DVDSpecial.ru]