Архив форума "Клуб любителей DVD" с 2000 по 2014гг


[Индекс] [Посмотреть ветку] [Настройки] [DVDSpecial.ru]

Какие, собственно, претензии к этому сайту (+)

Автор: VodkaShot
Дата: 13.04.12, @10:28

  Просто интересно. По мне, так весьма авторитетный сайт, без явных перекосов, как, например с-нет.

' ревью с сайта который живет от рекламы.... это ж англоязычный экслер.
И что? Какой сайт не живет с рекламы? Те фотки, которые ГАС постил, думаешь, откуда взялись?

'
'
' Как на такое можно смотреть! Кошмар!))))
' Более идиотскую аргументацию, чем сравнивать экраны под микроскопом, найти трудно.
' Да, ЛСД - это тупо квадраты, а АМОЛЕД - это ячейки по три сабпиксела. На фотках это хорошо видно. Да, у СГС2 структура экрана другая, чем остальных Галакси. И что?
'
'
' Бля, такое впечатление, что всем покупателям айфонов вместе с выдачей покупки делают какую-то лоботомию, так что они становятся как зомби и долдонят одно и то же, даже когда их ткнешь носом.
'
' И да, знающие люди уже давно вынесли вердикт - экран у СГС2 зе бест оф зе бест оф зе бест!
'
' http://www.engadget.com/2011/04/28/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-review/
'
' Display
'
' The Galaxy S II's screen is nothing short of spectacular. Blacks are impenetrable, colors pop out at you, and viewing angles are supreme. This would usually be the part where we'd point out that qHD (960 x 540) resolution is fast becoming the norm among top-tier smartphones and that the GSII's 800 x 480 is therefore a bit behind the curve, but frankly, we don't care. With a screen as beautiful as this, such things pale into insignificance. And we use that verb advisedly -- whereas the majority of LCDs quickly lose their luster when you tilt them away from center, color saturation and vibrancy on the Galaxy S II remain undiminished. It is only at extreme angles that you'll notice some discoloration, but that's only if you're looking for it and takes nothing away from the awe-inspiring experience of simply using this device.
'
' Whether you're pushing it to its limits with movie watching or just tamely browsing the web, the Super AMOLED Plus panel inside the Galaxy S II never fails to remind you that it's simply better than almost everything else that's out there. For an instructive example of the contrast on offer here, take a look at our recent post regarding the LG Optimus Big's upcoming launch in Korea. The pattern on that handset's white back was so subtle on our desktop monitor that we completely missed it, whereas when we looked at the same image on the GSII, it looked clear as day. Maybe that doesn't speak too highly of the monitors we're working with, but it underlines the supremacy of the display Samsung has squeezed into the Galaxy S II.
'
' We'd even go so far as to say it's better than the iPhone 4's screen, purely because, at 4.3 inches, it gives us so much more room to work with. It's almost impossible to split the two up in terms of quality of output, they're both top notch. Notably, however, that was also true of Samsung's original Super AMOLED display, the one that graced the 4-inch Galaxy S, and by now you must be wondering if there's actually anything significant enough in the new S-AMOLED technology to justify appending that "Plus" to its name. The short answer is yes, and it's all in the pixels.
'
' The one major downside to the original Super AMOLED panel was to be found in its PenTile matrix subpixel arrangement. It employed an RGBG pattern, wherein you got two green subpixels for every pair of red and blue ones, but the overall resolution was counted on the basis of green subpixels. Ergo, a PenTile 800 x 480 resolution wasn't as rich at the subpixel level as your standard RGB screen (768,000 versus 1,152,000), which resulted in slightly grainier images than would otherwise have been the case. Well, that "otherwise" scenario is now with us, because Samsung has switched to a Real-Stripe RGB array in the 4.3-inch Galaxy S II, which means it packs the full 1.152 megasubpixel count and, as we've already noted, the display looks delectable for it. A lesser criticism of the original Galaxy S was that its colors were a little blown out and oversaturated, but that's once again rendered moot on the successor device -- a software setting called Background effect allows you to tweak saturation, so if you're feeling a little melancholy, you can tone down the intensity of your handset's colors to match your ennui. Basically, if we haven't made it clear already, this is everything that Super AMOLED was, minus the bad parts and plus an extra .3 inches in real estate. A triumph.
'
' Okay, there is one mildly irritating aspect about the Galaxy S II's screen and that's the auto-brightness -- it tends to hunt around for the correct setting and occasionally makes jarring jumps between darker and brighter values. Whether that's down to the ambient light sensor or the software reading data from it isn't all that important, what's relevant is that we found ourselves more comfortable with a human helming the brightness controls.

Сообщения в ветке


Ответ на сообщение
Ваше имя:
Пароль:
Ваш e-mail:
Тема:
Текст сообщения:
  
Посылать уведомление об ответе:    

[Индекс] [Посмотреть ветку] [Настройки] [DVDSpecial.ru]